FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Iran Responds, Trump's 48 Hour Ultimatum : Destroy Civil Energy (War Crime)

Iran Responds, Trump's 48 Hour Ultimatum : Destroy Civil Energy (War Crime)

Started by sharkbok41 REPLIES521 VIEWS· 22 Mar 2026, 14:31
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
22 Mar 2026, 14:31
#1
22 Mar 2026, 14:31#1

Bombing Schools was not enough....Trump now wants to pull a Putin by targeting civilian infrastructure.



Speaker of Iran’s Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf: “Immediately after the power plants and infrastructure in our country are targeted, the critical infrastructure, energy infrastructure, and oil facilities throughout the region will be considered legitimate targets and will be destroyed in an irreversible manner, and the price of oil will remain high for a long time. And throw down what is in your right hand; it will swallow up what they have made.”



The ICC needs to issue an arrest warrant for Donald Trump. Americans need to pack their shit, and move their military bases out of countries around the world. They are more trouble than they were wroth.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Mar 2026, 15:59
#2
22 Mar 2026, 15:59#2

Shame, poor Iran, the innocent victim...

ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
22 Mar 2026, 16:56
#3
22 Mar 2026, 16:56#3

The ICC needs to issue an arrest warrant for Donald Trump. Americans need to pack their shit, and move their military bases out of countries around the world. They are more trouble than they were wroth.


The Gulf states are reported to be furious, they spent a fortune hosting American military bases, investing in America and effectively bribing Trump. Now they find that instead of the American military bases protecting them, they are what's getting them attacked, and they also find for all that time and money they spent on him seem to have no influence over Trump in preventing him from doing something that was directly against their interests.


It's not just America first, it will be if it's not already, America alone.


Shame, poor Iran, the innocent victim...


So your response to a potential serious war crime is, shame but Iran deserves it?


I thought this operation was at least partially about helping the people of Iran...I'm not sure how destroying their energy supply is suppose to help them.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Mar 2026, 17:34
#4
22 Mar 2026, 17:34#4

It's a punitive threat to deter them from committing terrorism in straight of Hormuz.

TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
22 Mar 2026, 17:50
#5
22 Mar 2026, 17:50#5

And the blocking of the strait came after what? Terrorism, nothing less...


Shame, poor Iran, the innocent victim...


It is very funny. The big speculation of them all; liberals are en route to kill hundreds of millions people. Which requires a specific mindset. The idea that rights are suspended following certain behaviours (which is very funny, considering that many liberal posters are white people hailing from South Africa, they would not accept this mindset coming from their black skinned co-citizens)


Remember, peeps, liberals have now a long history of criminalising poverty... And they are doubling down on the trend. Extremely promising.




ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
22 Mar 2026, 18:03
#6
22 Mar 2026, 18:03#6

It's a punitive threat to deter them from committing terrorism in straight of Hormuz.


It's still a war crime that will affect the civilian population...you're arguing in favour of war crimes now.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Mar 2026, 18:10
#7
22 Mar 2026, 18:10#7

What is a WAR CRIME Superidiots?



ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
22 Mar 2026, 18:34
#8
22 Mar 2026, 18:34#8

Your posts Mike...for crimes against brain cells.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Mar 2026, 18:45
#9
22 Mar 2026, 18:45#9

No body else invovled in war crimes - only Trump, Weird idea.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
22 Mar 2026, 19:59
#10
22 Mar 2026, 19:59#10

If Trump were actually to carry out a threat to “obliterate” or “destroy all of Iran’s energy infrastructure” in the way his current rhetoric suggests, that would certainly amount to war crimes under international law,


What his threat looks like under IHL

International humanitarian law (IHL) prohibits:

  1. Direct attacks on civilian objects, including energy infrastructure that is primarily or overwhelmingly civilian in function.
  2. Attacks that are “wanton” or “without objects of military advantage,” or that are designed to cause widespread suffering or collective punishment rather than to gain a specific military advantage.


If the stated purpose is to “make the Hormuz blockade economically and politically unbearable” by systematically destroying power plants, gas processing facilities, and grid infrastructure across Iran, that is effectively a threat to use energy deprivation as a weapon against the civilian population. That aligns closely with what experts and courts have described as war crime type conduct (e.g., the Russia–Ukraine energy attacks).


When it would not be automatically unlawful

Energy infrastructure can be a lawful target if:

  1. A specific plant or node is predominantly used to power major military facilities or directly supports combat operations, and its destruction offers a concrete, direct military advantage.
  2. The attack is proportionate: the expected civilian harm (loss of heat, water, hospitals, basic services) is not excessive compared with that military advantage.


Even then, a blanket or “obliterate all” campaign across the national grid would almost certainly violate the principles of distinction, proportionality, and the prohibition on wanton destruction.


Likely war crime type elements here

If Trump follows through along the lines of his current threat, the pattern would raise strong indicators of war crimes:


  1. Purposely targeting civilian dependent systems on a national scale to inflict hardship rather than to disable specific military capabilities.
  2. Executing a systematic campaign against energy infrastructure that foreseeably causes mass civilian suffering (blackouts, hospitals offline, water treatment failure, etc.) without clearly bounded military advantage.
  3. Using civilian infrastructure as leverage in an ultimatum: “open the Strait of Hormuz in 48 hours or we destroy your power plants” is a classic sign of collective punishment, which is expressly prohibited under IHL.


Practical law enforcement caveat

Whether anyone is actually prosecuted is a separate question. The Rome Statute lists “extensive destruction of property not justified by military necessity” and “wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages” as war crimes, but enforcement depends on jurisdiction, political will, and whether courts can reach the responsible officials. What is clear, however, is that the planned act would be unlawful under existing treaty law and customary IHL, even if not every state is in a position to hold it accountable.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Mar 2026, 20:15
#11
22 Mar 2026, 20:15#11

Yes, the deliberate blowing up of civilian shipping is a war crime. International Humanitarian Law (IHL) strictly prohibits intentionally targeting civilians or civilian objects, which includes merchant vessels and their crews, unless they are being used for a military purpose


… But not a peep about that from the Trump derangement crowd. Even back in WW1 it was a major reason for US to enter the war. You chaps are so biased you just keep tripping over your own arguments

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
22 Mar 2026, 20:17
#12
22 Mar 2026, 20:17#12

A no win situation. The only way to defeat Iran is to destroy the global economy for years -itself an act of terrorism.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Mar 2026, 20:22
#13
22 Mar 2026, 20:22#13

And yet no deliberate attack has been made by the US on Iranian power plants…..whereas 20 civilian vessels have actually been attacked. Let alone all the other civilian targets they have deliberately already hit. Pure bias,

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Mar 2026, 20:52
#14
22 Mar 2026, 20:52#14

When will the Americans finish their investigation into the girls primary school that was hit by not just one but at least three missiles? The school was "triple tapped" as they apparently call it. Three separate missile hits, not just one as we all thought.


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yqqyly9n0o


If I was a Trumpanzee, I'd shut up about war crimes until that tragedy is cleared up . . . especially as Bozo still refuses to admit it and and last I saw he pretended that he didn't know anything about it.


Civilian vessels being shot at is pretty tame compared to the deaths of 176 schoolgirls aged between 7 and 12.



DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:13
#15
22 Mar 2026, 21:13#15

If it can be proven that it was a deliberate targeting of the school by the Trump admin, he will be impeached and removed from office and will probably put behind bars...I suspect subotage from a deranged until Trump mole somewhere in the intelligence community.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:19
#16
22 Mar 2026, 21:19#16

"I suspect subotage from a deranged until Trump mole somewhere in the intelligence community."


I see . . . so according to you it was someone with TDS trying to make Bozo look bad?


Is that more convenient for you to believe? Do you have anything to back that up?

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:24
#17
22 Mar 2026, 21:24#17

But the question remains, when will this investigation be completed?


I think we all know if it was an American promary school hit by an Iranian missile the investigation would have been completed within an hour. Here we are three and a half weeks later and they're still trying to find someone to blame.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:38
#18
22 Mar 2026, 21:38#18

"I see . . . so according to you it was someone with TDS trying to make Bozo look bad?"


More likely a foreign plant.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:46
#19
22 Mar 2026, 21:46#19

United States military investigation

On 5 March, Reuters reported that two American military personnel involved in an internal investigation believed the attack was likely perpetrated by the US, although a final conclusion had not yet been reached. The US and Israel had divided their strikes geographically, with the US responsible for striking targets in southern Iran where the school was located. Independent analysis of satellite imagery suggested that the school and the Sayyid al-Shuhada military complex had been struck near-simultaneously by air-delivered munitions.[39]

On 11 March, the New York Times reported that the preliminary findings of the investigation determined that the US was responsible for the strike. The inquiry suggested that the school was likely targeted due to outdated coordinates provided by the Defense Intelligence Agency.[40][41]

On 13 March, US secretary of defense Pete Hegseth promised a thorough probe into the strike, in what the Washington Post described as a tacit acknowledgement of US responsibility for the attack.[42]



BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:55
#20
22 Mar 2026, 21:55#20

Opinion

The Editorial Board

Trump Is Hiding the Truth About the War in Iran

March 21, 2026

Credit...Illustration by Rebecca Chew/The New York Times

By The Editorial Board

The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.

From his first announcement of the attack on Iran on Feb. 28, President Trump has issued a stream of falsehoods about the war. He has said Iran wants to engage in negotiations, though its government shows no sign of it. He has claimed that the United States “destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability” when Tehran continues to inflict damage throughout the region. He has said the war is almost complete even as he calls in reinforcements from around the globe.

Lying is standard behavior for Mr. Trump, of course. His political career began with a lie about Barack Obama’s birthplace, and he has lied about his business, his wealth, his inauguration crowd size, his defeat in the 2020 election and so much more. A CNN tally of Mr. Trump’s falsehoods during one part of his first term found that he averaged eight false claims per day. Many people are so accustomed to his lies that they hardly notice them anymore.

Yet lying about war is uniquely corrosive. When a president signals that the truth does not matter in wartime, he encourages his cabinet and his generals to mislead the country and one another about how the war is going. He creates a culture in which deadly mistakes and even war crimes can become more common. He makes it harder to win by hiding the realities of conflict and by making allies wary of joining the fight. Ultimately, he undermines American values and interests.

There is a reasonable debate to have about the wisdom of this war. Iran’s murderous government does indeed present a threat — to its own people, to its region and to global stability. Mr. Trump could make a fact-based argument for confronting the regime now, especially to prevent it from menacing its neighbors and, above all, from developing a nuclear weapon. We are skeptical, but we acknowledge that there is a case to be made.


Mr. Trump is not making it. Instead, he has lied about the reasons for the war and about its progress, in an apparent attempt to disguise his poor planning and the war’s questionable basis.


The president was only a few minutes into his Feb. 28 announcement of the start of the conflict when he offered an obviously contradictory rationale for it. He repeated his claim that American attacks last June “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program while also citing that program as a reason to go to war. The claim of obliteration is false: Iran retains about 970 pounds of highly enriched uranium, potentially enough for 10 warheads.

The lies have continued since then. Days later, Mr. Trump said the U.S. military had a “virtually unlimited supply” of high-end munitions. The Pentagon nevertheless has had to withdraw weapons from South Korea to sustain its efforts in the Middle East. He has also asserted that “nobody” believed Iran would retaliate by attacking Arab countries. On Monday, he said that “no, the greatest experts, nobody thought they were going to hit” neighboring countries. In truth, some experts had warned of precisely this scenario.

In another instance, Mr. Trump has used false information to continue his alarming penchant to portray people who contradict him as un-American. Last weekend, he posted an allegation that “Iran, working in close coordination with the Fake News Media” had spread fake videos of an American aircraft burning in the ocean. The White House has offered no examples of American media outlets having done so. Instead, several debunked fake online videos, CNN reported. Nonetheless, Mr. Trump wrote that “you can say that those Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information!”

A shocking falsehood came on March 7, when Mr. Trump claimed in his typically offhand way that a strike on an elementary school in the town of Minab during the first hours of the war “was done by Iran.” The attack killed at least 175 people, most of them children. The U.S. military has conducted an investigation and preliminarily concluded that an American missile mistakenly hit the school. The military deserves credit for its honesty. The commander in chief, however, still has not retracted his statement.


This pattern is an echo of the wars in Vietnam and Iraq, when small lies grew into bigger ones, such as the covered-up massacres in My Lai and Haditha. The consequences of those untruths were long-lasting. Americans’ faith in government never recovered from the deceptions of Vietnam. And the second Iraq war, which George W. Bush’s administration sold on the grounds of fictitious weapons of mass destruction, represents the start of our cynical modern political era. Since that war began in 2003, every Gallup poll asking about the country’s direction has shown that most Americans are dissatisfied with it.

Lies about war also make it harder to achieve victory: The more one spreads falsehoods, the less one feels obliged to face reality. In retrospect, Americans understand that their leaders’ refusal to confront the truth in Iraq and Vietnam led to strategic errors. The pattern is repeating. Before Mr. Trump began this war, he brushed aside warnings from his top military adviser that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz to traffic it does not approve. The global economy is now dealing with the consequences of his overconfidence.

He may yet learn a more personal lesson about lying in war. Lyndon Johnson and George W. Bush will forever be remembered as having misled Americans about U.S. military action. They learned that falsehoods can boomerang on the leaders who tell them.

Starting a war is the most serious action that a political leader can take. It ends lives and can change history. The decisions that guide war must be based in reality, and presidents owe American service members and their families the truth about why they are being asked to fight. Whatever short-term gain Mr. Trump thinks he is getting by lying about the war in Iran is far exceeded by the cost, for him, the country and the world.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Mar 2026, 21:59
#21
22 Mar 2026, 21:59#21

Yes George Bush lied about WMD knowing full well a few weeks later it would be discovered as a lie and his presidency would for ever be tailnted by that dishonesty. Does that make any sense?


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Mar 2026, 22:34
#22
22 Mar 2026, 22:34#22

And Bozo didn't lie about an "imminent strike" from Iran?

BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
23 Mar 2026, 01:21
#23
23 Mar 2026, 01:21#23

PS duToit injury ... any updates anyone ?

ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
23 Mar 2026, 01:41
#24
23 Mar 2026, 01:41#24

And yet no deliberate attack has been made by the US on Iranian power plants…..whereas 20 civilian vessels have actually been attacked. Let alone all the other civilian targets they have deliberately already hit. Pure bias,


Whereas 20 civilian vessels have actually been attacked...after Israel and United States struck Iran in an unprovoked and illegal attack...did you get forget that part?


Yes Iran are responsible for illegal attacks on civilian vessels and targets, it is illegal and I have no issue with the US, Israel or other countries striking back stop those attacks...but Iran would not launch those attacks but for Israel and the US attacking it first.


The United States and Israel have a collective responsibility for the consequences of this war. As I've said before...this is the United States and Israel's mess they need to man up and fix it, or man up and take responsibility. But I don't think Israel actually care for the consequences for the rest of the world, they have their own priorities, which I don't think align 1 to 1 with the US.

TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
23 Mar 2026, 07:58
#25
23 Mar 2026, 07:58#25

. International Humanitarian Law (IHL) strictly prohibits intentionally targeting civilians or civilian objects, which includes merchant vessels and their crews, unless they are being used for a military purpose



Very funny. Great laughter. There is so much in the mental framework as usual, desire to find symmetry (they are just as bad as liberals), absence of universality etc


The strait of Hormuz is a war zone submitted to a blockade. Any ship trying to force the blockage is given a military purpose. It is straightforward.


Liberals hate so much on humanity, they can not give other human beings the possibility to act. Liberals may act in any fashion, it is superb, it is moral, it is done for the benefit of all of humanity.


The US placed Venezuela under a blockade lately and liberals would have rationalised any ship trying to get through the blockage and being blown up as having it coming. The ships should not have been there, they should have known better. Notice again, peeps, rationality. Venezuela did not send that many ships to try to break the blockade. They acted rationally. And Venezuela is a terrible government, liberals shift the burden of rational behaviour on these kinds of governments as liberal countries are less and less able to act rationally.


And this is was not a war zone. Any action taken would have been worse than a war crime.


And here the situation: war zone, blockade, liberals want to use civilians to break the blockade, Iran at fault for enforcing the blockade, liberals not at fault for using civilians for military purpose.


This is the situation, peeps, and it is so exciting. Hundreds of millions people killed by liberals incoming.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
23 Mar 2026, 13:10
#26
23 Mar 2026, 13:10#26

Iran is committing war crimes by striking civilian targets in the Middle East.

However, the only thing that can be said is they are in an existential threat -with few other options.


It would be fine to strike American bases in the Middle East that are being used to plan and stage attacks on Iran.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Mar 2026, 14:19
#27
23 Mar 2026, 14:19#27

I would not even respond to t he s hit above - because to argue with brainwashed idiots do not result in real debate on issues, They ignored the involvement of the Ayatolllah Regime in Iran in amin g and finding terrorism in a score o counries worldwide and the Ayatollah Regime in development of Nuclear Armaments


Our site idiots celebratred the bribe connected Nuclear Arms Traty cncobnted by Obama and based entirely on so-called inspection of enrichment activities by the fact that they claimed Trump scrapped in 2018. They ignored the fact that Iran just oved the enrichment facilities to different venues - which the Iran Government called army bases - where inspections were not allowed, Trump did th wron g th ing to scrap th e fae treaty concocted by Obama and when he became President he reached out to Iran to ngotiate an agrement on two issues.


  1. stopping of the enrichment program and the development of a nuclear-armed Iran; and
  2. stopping of Iran invovlement in civil wars and terrorism worldwide.


The negotiations went nowhere and in 2025 Trump authorized the bombing of the new Uranium enrchent acilities - some moved underground, On site the memebrs elebrated the fact that the whole uranium envirhent facilities was damaged - but not totally destroying of enrichment faciliies and was stopped,


Before that and after the attack by Hamas on Israel in October 2023 - the Gaza War started . In teh USA the media started an atatck on Israel responding to the Hamas attack and in h e USA with he help of Democrat subsidiaries funded by the US Govenment broke out in USA colegesss, Te rioters shouted "Death to Israel" and "Death to America", And the ever traitorous Biden Autopen Regime - who released illegally unfroze hundreds of millions of funds to the Iran Regime - delayed arms deliveries to Israel, The fact is that with the help of Turkey, the UA E and Eqyot Trmp mnaged to cause the stop of the Gaza War. What a celebrated on site that there were still some attacks by Israel on Gaza - but thiose were rare and new totally stopped ecently. No credit to Trump at all - but then nobody wanted to end the Gaza War beause stopping would end up in credit be given to Trump.


In 2024 the Houthi's in Yemen started attacking shipping in the Red S ea and the Gulf of Aden, The so-called NATO allies pleaded wih Trump to act against the Houthi and Alshabaah regimes in Yemen and Somalia respectively, Trump reacted by bombing the Iran financed and armed Houthi camps bnd he attacks stopped,


Iran's invovlement in terrorism workdwide remained a poblm though, In the emantime protsts in Iran broke out in December 2025 and the Trump Government warned the Iran Giovernment not to kill protestors, They ignored that request and since t hen more than 30 000 Irain protestirs were murdered by the Ayatolah Regime.afr promising it would not happen. but it did.


Over th apst week Trump was attackd because he stated the obvious about the Pearl Harbour attack iby Japan. Wht thssite idiots missed on is that informing Congress of imminent action would be known to Iran and other US enemiesd within an hour from making such reports. There are deadly enemies of the USA in the D emocratic Party who would nform the USA enemies of exactly what would happen. There are more enemies o he USA in he Demcoraic Party than there are enmies of Trump on this site,


S o the USA murdered children in a girl school was part of the bad Iran attacks. The school wa immdediately adjacent to the army base from where attacks on shipping took place, .What is clear is that the school was in the same street block as t he army base was - in fac imediately next to the base. - even wth morden armaments accidental damag e cud be caue in military attacks, IIt obviously was a military mistake - but to clame that incident without any real investigation on the US Government is for hes ite eelements hating Trump enough o epeat constantly on site,


Hating Tump was a prme reason why the site members are squarly backing the Ayatollah dictatorship in Iran and they evn ould suppott a nuclear armed Iran as long as their pet haed Trump is the Presient,


. . ,

ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
23 Mar 2026, 14:19
#28
23 Mar 2026, 14:19#28

And Trump has TACO'd again. Postponing the strikes on the Iranian Energy planets for 5 days, stating there has been progress in talks with Iran.


Iran immediately releases a statement saying there has been no direct or indirect contact between the US and Iran.


LMAO.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
23 Mar 2026, 14:22
#29
23 Mar 2026, 14:22#29

Yes, I see. We have just had a Truth Social...Trump is a compulsive liar. The dumb fool is now seeing the damage that Iran can do to the global economy that would put the world economy in receission for years.

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
23 Mar 2026, 14:52
#30
23 Mar 2026, 14:52#30

Crazy times

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Mar 2026, 15:29
#31
23 Mar 2026, 15:29#31

Trump is about results and everything he says is fungible in the pursuit of the goal he has in mind. If the war ends with Iran’s nuclear potential pushed back 5 years, Israel secured, other ME countries clearly in the Western Camp and oil flowing freely through Hormuz…..it’s a win.


All the headlines in the Woke press this morning are a joke. They simply haven’t grasped the obvious tactics Trump is using. Nor have our woke set.


There you are chaps a little blood pressure inducement. ROFL!

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,261 posts
23 Mar 2026, 15:41
#32
23 Mar 2026, 15:41#32

Ha, Ha - Stop trying to turn this into a Netflix American war hero movie...Saving Private Trump.


And that is better than the Obama deal? How?


How exactly is Israel secured? Remember that all the Arab countries are members of the Islamic League that will now hate Israel more than ever (Admittedly, much of Israel's own doing....)


Pushing back Iran's program for 5 years? What about the mess that has been caused by their own generations? Iran now has the enriched plutonium it needs, thanks to Trump ending the nuclear deal





CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Mar 2026, 16:17
#33
23 Mar 2026, 16:17#33

So Trump lies and the A yatollah Regime is talking the triuith. Brillianmt BS supreme that one. When will you stop lickiong the arse of the Ayatollah Regime sheisters?

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
23 Mar 2026, 16:30
#34
23 Mar 2026, 16:30#34

Crazy times Mike..... crazy times

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Mar 2026, 16:38
#35
23 Mar 2026, 16:38#35

SB


And that is better than the Obama deal? How?


Everything. The deal was linked to major corruption on the part of the Obanmma Government by claiming the Iran was repaid $1,8 billion of frozen Iran funds and the Iran Government claiming they only recevied $1,342 billion. Where did the rest - all of $4$8 million go? Why did Obama walked into the WH declairing his assets was $3,5 million and immediately after departure from the WH - before receiving anything for his book and vudei appearances bought luxury homes caisting over $32 nillion.. He is now building the Obama Memorial Library i- a real archtectial monstrosity - in Chicago at a cost of $350 million. Where did the money come from - the fuckwit wealk-livered Obama was corrupt and dishonest.


The Teheran Government allowed no inspections - but moved the Uranoum enrchment to new venues which they claimed were army camps where no inspecftions were allowed. After that fake deal the Aatollah Regime increased their enrichment capacity.


Ever think the USA did not knopw what was happening on Iran after the deal - what about satellite spyin g and evidence - as wella s the degree of htared of the totalitarian regie that leads to internal spying by th epeople on their won Governmnt,


How did the Israeli's knew exactly where he A a tollah nd his close companions were he day h e died deservedly so. The people of Iran told them what was going to happen,


Yoiu are a stinking arselicker yourself dimness,

MP
MpowerPro5,061 posts
23 Mar 2026, 17:18
#36
23 Mar 2026, 17:18#36

Ja Sure, trust the "bozo's" plan, outcomes justify everything...That argument sounds clever until you actually ask: which outcomes, measured how, and by who?


If Iran's nuclear program gets pushed back five years but the whole region blows up in the process, does that count as a win?


If Hormuz stays open but the instability spills over and ignites a whole new conflict somewhere else, fought with someone else's blood, is that success?


And notice how anyone who questions any of this just "doesn't get it"...that's not analysis, that's a way of avoiding the argument altogether.


The whole thing only works because nobody is actually measuring any of those outcomes right now.


So if things go sideways the target just quietly get moved and it was "always the plan."


That is not analysis, that is just deciding the result after the game is already over and calling it a prediction.


ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
23 Mar 2026, 20:45
#37
23 Mar 2026, 20:45#37

Trump is about results and everything he says is fungible in the pursuit of the goal he has in mind. If the war ends with Iran’s nuclear potential pushed back 5 years, Israel secured, other ME countries clearly in the Western Camp and oil flowing freely through Hormuz…..it’s a win.


All the headlines in the Woke press this morning are a joke. They simply haven’t grasped the obvious tactics Trump is using. Nor have our woke set.


Tactics...you still think Trump actually has a plan after all this time...just look at Trumps speeches, words and actions over the years and then apply Occam's razor, the simplest answer is usually correct, and that answer is that the man is an idiot.


But frankly we have people so invested in avoiding admitting that the emperor has no clothes that Trump could go on stage, take a poo on it...then hold it up and declare *with this, our victory over Iran is complete' and they would all applaud.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Mar 2026, 21:34
#38
23 Mar 2026, 21:34#38

‘But frankly we have people so invested in avoiding admitting that the emperor has no clothes’ (I omit the rest because it’s a bit puerile).


Not as rabid a group as those who are so invested in Trump’s humiliation anything good is bad and anything bad is good,

ST
Stavanger1Pro4,532 posts
23 Mar 2026, 21:47
#39
23 Mar 2026, 21:47#39

It's not rabid...the man is a ongoing danger, doing serious damage to the world, we're simply pointing out the obvious. Calling everything woke is just denial.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
24 Mar 2026, 07:41
#40
24 Mar 2026, 07:41#40

Stav


Wh don;t you always rite tripe on site? The A yatollah Regime is a dan gerous situation for the whole f the ME and in Africa with t heir armin g and finding terorism - but it is just forgotten by you.


As to a settlement of the present situation iro Iran - the eals tuation is that talks will be as follows:-


Direct talks between the United States and Iran on ending the war could be held in Islamabad as early as this week, Reuters reported on Monday.

Until now, intermediaries including Egypt, Pakistan, and several Gulf states have been relaying messages between Washington and Tehran, a European official also told the news agency.

Iranian media also reported that President Masoud Pezeshkian and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif discussed the war’s impact on regional and global security during a phone call earlier Monday.



↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Mikes Gripes

More news