If it was 1935 . . .

Plum, some advice........stop babbling and who knows the board would better understand you....and do get off your soap box.

define irony...

"...stop babbling and who knows the board would better understand you... "

Notice how all the conspiracy theory photos are always blurry, long shots.

This is the Loch Ness monster....

Ok, I'll start you off...

1) Clear

2) Adequate backstory

3)

4)

5)

6)

7)

8)  

9) 

10)

Firstly, something that is not Hearsay. (E.g. A "former" FBI agent, cousin brother's friend said that all will be revealed soon...). 

If aliens arrived, they would either announce themselves or hide their presence. 

1. No aliens have announced themselves. 

2. If aliens were able to make it to earth, they would be able to hide their presence without us seeing them. (in most likelihood). 

If they were going to abduct people, why not choose someone like Elon Musk, or Einstein or someone from NASA etc - instead of the simpletons who claim to have been abducted. 

What would be their motive?
If they could travel the galaxy, they would have lots of planets to go to. Or they could terraform one of the many planets that are uninhabitable -e. g. a Mars-like planet closer to their own sun.  

A) If it was good aliens, my guess is that they would just skip the human race, as sharing technology with us would be disastrous to the galaxy.
(See the Prime Directive in Star Wars of only interacting with species that have invented warp drive, and therefore a space-faring race). 

B) If it was bad aliens, they would want the planet. Surely by now, they would have tried to conquer the planet. Their presence would then be known to us. 

Unless you are suggesting Aliens from different places around the universe randomly stop by and abduct a few people, get bored and then drive off to the next planet. 

What conditions? All I have asked for is for VisKop, and yourself since you're here, to lay out as many criteria as you like that a photograph could be judged under in order to determine if aliens are real or not. I'm not sure that allowing you full discretion qualifies as a condition since it's an entirely open-ended proposition. It's up to you. 

VisKop...the questions you are asking and the statements that you're making all fall broadly under the larger question that I asked at the time, more than once. That of WHY the US government are releasing videos and "allowing" pilots to talk about it. Read that again if you have to...in fact, just read it three times cos I know you have to.

But you took this as me saying that aliens are visiting earth.

...and then you asked for a clear picture. Thereby tacitly admitting that a clear picture had the potential to persuade you. 

So, do you still think a clear picture would crack the case?

...or have you changed your mind?

ButtPlug, I definitely think clear pictures of UFOs will crack this case. Please go ahead.

ButtPlug, I already disproved that video you claimed was a spaceship going 30,000 miles per hour

The camera recording this "UFO" stays in range, and the only way this would be possible is that the camera was in an airborne ship moving at the same speed.

(Or if the camera was so far away - like on the moon- but even then, it would not be possible to keep the same aspect ratio with the alien craft in the centre for very long). 

To think scientifically or objectively is to clear your mind of emotion. If you "want" to believe something, you will just filter out any facts that do not support what you want to believe. 
It is about being impartial. 

The hubcap evidence you posted last time was hysterical, please include more stuff like that for us to be festive on this Friday afternoon for the weekend.

" ButtPlug, I definitely think clear pictures of UFOs will crack this case. Please go ahead."

Cool, list your criteria...

Ok, i'll post some. 

So are we saying the photo must be clear and have a reliable backstory?

It would really be great if you two numbskulls could narrow it down since a large portion of the ufo photos available online today are quite clear and have a good backstory.

Even my basic Photoshop editing skills could create something that "looks" like a UFO. 
Although how do we even know a UFO is a circle? 

But do please send us more doctored pictures of UFOs , like the cult classic hubcap you once sent. 

"Cool, list your criteria..."

Criteria? Ummmm . . . clear pictures of UFOs. That's all.

What's confusing here, ButtPlug? You asked if we'd like to see clear pictures of UFOs and I'm saying yes. What hoops would you still like me to jump through before you put up what you offered to put up?

This is like ordering a steak at one of those overpriced and pretentious restaurants where you order the steak and the waiter starts asking loads of questions . . .

Would you like rump, sirloin, fillet or rib eye?

Sirloin please.

How would you like your steak sir, rare, medium rare? 

Medium rare thanks.

Would you like grass-fed or grain-fed?

Ummm . . . grass-fed is fine.

Basted or plain?

Plain.

Would you like chips, rice or a baked potato with that, sir?

Chips.

Would you like a cheese sauce, garlic sauce, pepper sauce or mushroom sauce?

Pepper.

Would you like it on a skillet or a plate?

Oh for goodness sake . . . a plate is fine!

What colour plate . . . sir . . . sir . . . where are you going?

I'm going to get a steak!

You googled "clear ufo pictures" an d pasted the link? That's it?

Looks Familiar? 

UFO Above. Same UFO from the picture you claimed was a clear picture of a UFO, I just changed the background

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dogshit below hovering above the water....

I must admit the UFO blends in better with the new background I selected, than the dog shit.

This took me about 2 minutes to do, and my photoshop skills are very basic. 

It is called layers. Take a fake image and layer it on top of a real background image

I am all ears ButtPlug, go ahead...

That last guy looks familiar....

Why does that shirt illustrate ANC colours....

Hahahahaha….some funny stuff. But it was Goering not Goebbels and we actually discussed our art collections And we certainly didn’t drink Riesling with pate de foie gras, waaaaaahahaha, what a plebeian   idea.

The golf match was strange… Hitler liked to fly the hazards, but we soon discovered why, he was doomed in the bunkers. Rommel, however, was very good in the sand. 

The rest of the lads were enthusiastic, but careful not to better Hitler’s score on any hole.

Goebbels was very erratic and after a few holes he had no balls at all.

Sadly poor old Peeper never made it to 1935. He was found in the bed of Ernst Röhm by Hitler and dispatched with the same revolver that killed Ernst,  who shared his obsession with the male member. The members were expelled from the club at it were.

Game, set and match?

Funny that Red Rose mentioned koro...not impossible at all that he could be a Rooi alter...might be a full- on skitso for all we know...

Funny that Red Rose mentioned koro...not impossible at all that he could be a Rooi alter...might be a full- on skitso for all we know...

Red Rose is a banished Metonite...come to as an agent to disrupt all the false information spread on this forum and set the records straight...LOL.

Plum, they still won't twig...minds already locked . No room in their psyche for uncomfortable ideas.